AI Workforce Readiness Council

Established June 2025

AI Workforce Readiness Council

The AI Workforce Readiness Council helps align Mississippi’s AI talent pipeline across K-12, postsecondary education, workforce training, industry, and public-sector needs.

$9.1MMAI-TAP Investment
3Working Teams
K-12Through Workforce
StatewideAI Alignment

Current Full Report

Mississippi Statewide AI Framework

For the full Council-developed framework, use the current full report page. This separates the complete report from the shorter priority and learning progression overview pages so readers can quickly understand which resource they need.

Full Framework Report

Current statewide AI framework report

This is the best link for readers who need the complete framework report, including the broader statewide context, AI literacy structure, and implementation guidance connected to the Council’s work.

View Full Report

Council Resources

Shared priorities and a common AI learning path

The Council connects statewide AI priorities with a learning progression framework so institutions, employers, and public partners can use a common language for AI readiness. These are resource pages, while the current full report is linked separately below.

Council Foundation

Mississippi’s Statewide AI Priorities

The priorities define Mississippi’s shared direction for AI literacy, responsible use, data privacy and security, workforce readiness, statewide alignment, and measurable outcomes.

Read the Priorities

Learning Progression

Mississippi AI Learning Progression Framework

Developed by the AI Workforce Readiness Council and hosted by MAIN, the framework maps AI skills from kindergarten through senior career leadership. It is not a curriculum or mandate; instead, it gives partners a shared AI readiness language.

Read the Framework

Origin and Purpose

Why the Council exists

On June 12, 2025, Governor Tate Reeves announced the Mississippi AI Talent Accelerator Program, a $9.1 million initiative to expand AI, machine learning, and technical capacity across Mississippi’s institutions of higher learning.

Established through MAI-TAP

The Council was established through the State Workforce Investment Board and AccelerateMS to coordinate AI workforce readiness work connected to the statewide investment.

Read Governor’s Announcement

Alignment, not mandates

The Council does not set standards, prescribe curriculum, or create policy. Instead, it builds shared language, priorities, and expectations across education and workforce.

Cross-sector representation

Chaired by MAIN Director, Dr. Kollin Napier, the Council brings together education, workforce, government, research, and industry partners so no single perspective drives the work alone.

How the Council Works

Three working teams, one coordinated effort

The AI Workforce Readiness Council organizes its work through three focused teams. Together, they connect statewide direction, learning expectations, and employer demand.

Statewide AI Priorities

This team identifies Mississippi’s highest-priority AI focus areas and helps orient education, workforce, and policy conversations toward shared goals.

Curriculum Framework

This team builds the shared learning progression that describes AI competency from K-12 through postsecondary education and into the workforce.

Business and Industry Alignment

This team connects AI education to real workforce demand across healthcare, manufacturing, agriculture, technology, public service, and other sectors.

MAI-TAP Investment

Born from a statewide AI talent investment

MAI-TAP awarded $9.1 million in grants to seven institutions of higher learning. The program is a partnership between AccelerateMS, the Mississippi Development Authority, and Amazon Web Services.

Mississippi State University

$2.2M

Jackson State University

$1.3M

University of Southern Mississippi

$1.24M

Alcorn State University

$1.15M

Tougaloo College

$1.08M

Millsaps College

$1.0M

Mississippi College

$723K

Additional institutions contribute through existing funding and collaborative efforts, including Copiah-Lincoln Community College, Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College, Hinds Community College, and the University of Mississippi.

Council Membership

Contributing organizations and institutions

The Council draws on expertise from Mississippi’s education, workforce, industry, and public-sector landscape. This broad representation helps keep the work practical, equitable, and aligned with the state’s economic realities.

AccelerateMS
Amazon Web Services
NVIDIA
Oxford-Lafayette Economic Development Foundation
Mississippi Department of Information Technology Services
Alcorn State University
Mississippi Department of Education
Belhaven University
Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning
Copiah-Lincoln Community College
Mississippi Community College Board
Hinds Community College
Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College
Jackson State University
Millsaps College
Mississippi State University
Center for Cyber Education
University of Mississippi
Pearl Public School District
Mississippi College
Tougaloo College
University of Mississippi Medical Center
University of Southern Mississippi

Council Scope

What the Council does and does not do

The Council is a coordination body. It clarifies statewide AI readiness work without replacing local program design, institutional authority, or formal policy processes.

What the Council does

  • Defines shared AI skill domains and learning progressions across K-12, postsecondary education, and workforce.
  • Identifies Mississippi’s strategic AI priorities across education and industry.
  • Aligns AI education with employer needs and sector-specific workforce demand.
  • Makes handoff expectations visible at key transition points in a learner’s journey.
  • Reviews and updates its work as AI evolves.

What the Council does not do

  • It does not set state standards, required assessments, or proficiency cut scores.
  • It does not prescribe courses, curriculum, lesson plans, tools, platforms, or vendors.
  • It does not establish policy, endorsements, compliance requirements, or accountability structures.
  • It does not replace detailed program design at individual institutions.
  • It does not create legislation, requirements, or mandates of any kind.